|
Post by gk on Feb 1, 2010 13:28:16 GMT -6
Will this be as dumb in practice as it is in my head?
|
|
|
Post by fatmenace on Feb 1, 2010 20:37:37 GMT -6
Horrible, this idea.
|
|
|
Post by mayor on Feb 2, 2010 9:28:09 GMT -6
Terrible idea. I just hope someday the NCAA realizes that this whole 64 team tournament is ridiculous. What we really need is 32 individual, unconnected, post-season games with one of those games designated as the championship game between the top two teams in the nation. Of course it will be difficult to get the right two teams in the championship game, but wouldn't that make it so much more exciting? There would be argument and debate about which team should really be the champion. No one would really know who is best! Maybe some day...
|
|
|
Post by "Redneck" Johnson on Feb 2, 2010 17:35:16 GMT -6
Dumber than the current play-in game. Leave it be.
|
|
|
Post by gk on Apr 22, 2010 10:40:58 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by "Redneck" Johnson on Apr 22, 2010 22:30:45 GMT -6
Certainly beats the alternative. I wish the NCAA was less interested in the Count da Money.
|
|