|
Post by gk on Mar 2, 2010 18:39:39 GMT -6
It's about time we start focusing on the draft.
My question: what's with all these mocks showing Bradford going #1? These aren't serious, right?
|
|
|
Post by finkle on Mar 2, 2010 18:59:01 GMT -6
i have serious problems with the whole "you gotta take a QB #1 if you have a need and have that pick" philosophy.
i'd MUCH rather have Suh and Colt
|
|
|
Post by gk on Mar 2, 2010 19:58:23 GMT -6
I have serious problems with the Rams franchise.
|
|
|
Post by fatmenace on Mar 2, 2010 21:22:25 GMT -6
If the QB is a once in a lifetime guy, you take him. Otherwise at this point building the lines are the most important. Go wit Suh or Gerald McCoy and don't look back.
|
|
|
Post by gk on Apr 2, 2010 8:58:11 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by "Redneck" Johnson on Apr 2, 2010 9:23:15 GMT -6
I think Sam Bradford is a great guy with a lot of positives, but I really don't like taking a QB that high unless he's a once-in-a-lifetime player. And Bradford isn't one.
For every Peyton Manning, you'll have a bunch of Ryan Leafs or Jamarcus Russells. I'd get something that has a little less risk (like Suh) unless you know you're hitting a home run.
I'm happy for Earl Thomas doing so well in workouts but wish he wasn't going to go as early. We could've used him on the Viking.
|
|
|
Post by gk on Apr 2, 2010 10:07:39 GMT -6
I think this might be the first ever case of someone's stock increasing by getting injured.
|
|